Published on:

Defective DePuy Hip Replacements To Be Preserved As Evidence In Pending Lawsuits

As the number of DePuy Hip replacement lawsuits continues to expand, a recurring issue in many of the pending cases, centers around who shall control the defective hips and surrounding tissues when they are removed during replacement surgeries.  The removed material and orthopedic hardware is considered valuable evidence in pending product liability cases against DePuy.

According to a report on the DePuy litigation appearing on Bloomberg, DePuy spokesperson Mindy Tinsley, conclusively stated that the removed hip devices– known as explants– are indeed the property of the patient and patient’s surgeon’s, “should take appropriate steps to preserve them.”

Defective DePuy Hip ReplacementsWith that understanding in place, lawyers representing individuals who were given defective DePuy products and lawyers representing Johnson& Johnson, the parent company of DePuy Orthopedics, are arranging for a standardized protocol to arrange for the shipment of the removed devices to be shipped to a centralized location so testing can be conducted.

For thousands of people impacted by the defective DePuy products, this is an important development as the independent testing may provide valuable evidence in pending product liability claims and lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson and DePuy Orthopedics.

Status of DePuy Litigation

More than 37,000 people are believed to have received potentially defective DePuy hip replacement devices known as ASR XL Acetabular System.  In August, 2010 DePuy acknowledged the serious problems associated with their products and initiated a recall of the product.

At issue is the high failure rate of the device that commonly necessitates a second revisionist surgery far sooner than most anticipated.  In addition to replacement surgeries, other patients experienced serious problems such as: fractures, infection, and pain due to shards of cobalt and chromium that break away from the hip and implant into the surrounding tissues.

Presently, DePuy has hired Broadspire Service Inc., as a third-party claim administrator to oversee voluntary payments made by Johnson & Johnson to implant recipients.  Despite, the community outreach by Johnson & Johnson, many individuals have elected to retain lawyers to represent their personal interests.

Currently, Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers is reviewing a number of DePuy hip implant cases and is working with medical experts other lawyers involved in the litigation to help secure the best possible outcome for each client.  If you received a DePuy hip implant, you may have legal rights for compensation.  We encourage you to discuss your case with our DePuy hip recall lawyers, for a free, no obligation consultation today. (888) 424-5757


Defects With DePuy Hip Replacement Hardware May Give Rise To Lawsuits Against Manufacturer

Questions Persist With Problems Related To DePuy Hip Replacement Products

New Lawsuits Filed Against DePuy Orthopedics Related To Defective Hip Replacement Products

Client Reviews

  • Having worked in the medical field, I appreciated the way that Mr. Rosenfeld and his staff approached my family’s situation. The combination of medical knowledge and legal expertise was indeed the winning combination for our case.
  • While nothing can change the way our mother was treated at a nursing facility, I do feel a sense of vindication that the facility was forced to pay for their treatment. I am certain that they would never have done had my attorneys not held their feet to the fire.
  • I was very nervous about initiating a claim against my mother’s nursing facility, but Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers took care of everything from getting the medical records to going to court. I felt like I had real advocates on my side. That meant a lot to me.
  • After a horrific episode at a nursing home, my sister and I spoke to a number of law firms. No one took the time to answer our questions and explain the legal process like Mr. Rosenfeld. He did a tremendous job on our case and I can see why he’s earned the praise he has from clients and peers.
  • I liked the fact that I could call the office and ask questions about the legal process at anytime. I could tell that my case was in good hands. I think that this was reflected in my father’s settlement was more than I anticipated the case ever being worth.