Published on:

Judge Requires Bond While Nursing Home Verdict Is Appealed

Bond required while verdict is appealedNursing home negligence resulted in Dorothy’s death

Her son Tom Douglas admitted Dorothy Douglas, an 87-year-old woman to the Heartland Nursing Facility in 2009. Being an Alzheimer and Parkinson’s patient, Dorothy’s case was highly complicated; however, not so much that a registered professional nursing care home could not handle it. According to Tom and his lawyers, his mother’s condition had improved drastically since he started taking care of her. Where she couldn’t even stand up on her own, Dorothy had started to walk, talk and even recognize family members on her own. Seeing this improvement, Tom decided to enroll her temporarily at Heartland Nursing Care so that she could benefit from expert care and handling. Little did Tom know that the nursing facility he opted for was anything but professional. With an employee turnover rate of 112%, Heartland was extremely understaffed, with even fewer women caretakers than men. Such lack of care and attention took its toll on the 87 year old, who was soon confined to a wheelchair, despite being able to walk properly. On 11 October the same year, Dorothy expired at the Hospice of Huntington where she was transferred in critical condition. Sources have revealed that after three weeks in the Heartland facility, Douglas had lost 15 pounds, became severely dehydrated and her previous progress was nowhere to be seen.

Wrongful death and the law

Despite how complicated and severe his mother’s ailment was, Tom Douglas knew it was not her condition that caused her sudden demise. His lawyers, Lance Reins and Amy Quezan took up this case to present in front of a jury. Because of hard evidence of the Nursing Home’s neglect to a serious patient, Reins put forward a wrongful death statue for the jury to base their judgment on. Rightly so, because according to Tort Law, a wrongful death is a result of another party’s fault- be it intentional or unintentional. Negligence on the part of the administrative staff or poor handling of an incident clearly comes under the legal boundaries set for a death to be termed as wrongful. After a two-week trial, Jurors in the late Dorothy Douglas’s case gave the decision in her favor. During the trial former Heartland employees were also summoned who testified that the nursing home had been staggering downwards for quite some time.

Financial Compensation in Dorothy’s wrongful death

In light of such strong evidence, the deceased’s family was given $11.5 million in compensatory damages and another $80 million in punitive damages. This incident has led to a critical evaluation of Heartland Nursing Home’s business model. Charlie Johns and Benjamin Bailey, lawyers for Manor Inc.-the parent company that owns Heartland, have tried all they could to prove the nursing facility innocent. According to them, the staff was well trained and spent more time per patient than was required by state laws. More recently, Dorothy’s case was put on appeal in the Supreme Court with the Plaintiff’s attorney demanding a $50 million bond as safeguard for the patients if the nursing home is charged for the negligence.  This $50 million has been proposed to be reduced to $10 million instead by Manor Inc.’s defending lawyer.

For more information on nursing homes in Chicago look here. For laws related to Illinois nursing homes, look here.

Client Reviews

  • Having worked in the medical field, I appreciated the way that Mr. Rosenfeld and his staff approached my family’s situation. The combination of medical knowledge and legal expertise was indeed the winning combination for our case.
  • While nothing can change the way our mother was treated at a nursing facility, I do feel a sense of vindication that the facility was forced to pay for their treatment. I am certain that they would never have done had my attorneys not held their feet to the fire.
  • I was very nervous about initiating a claim against my mother’s nursing facility, but Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers took care of everything from getting the medical records to going to court. I felt like I had real advocates on my side. That meant a lot to me.
  • After a horrific episode at a nursing home, my sister and I spoke to a number of law firms. No one took the time to answer our questions and explain the legal process like Mr. Rosenfeld. He did a tremendous job on our case and I can see why he’s earned the praise he has from clients and peers.
  • I liked the fact that I could call the office and ask questions about the legal process at anytime. I could tell that my case was in good hands. I think that this was reflected in my father’s settlement was more than I anticipated the case ever being worth.