Published on:

Wilcox v. Schwartz

elderly-woman-nursing-home-connecticut-300x200Articles: Connecticut

Wilcox v. Schwartz

CASE:
Wilcox v. Schwartz
PARTIES:
Plaintiff (Appellee) – Wilcox
Defendant (Appellant) – Schwartz
COURT:
Appellate Court of Connecticut (2010)
PROCEDURAL HISTORY:

Plaintiffs filed a complaint for medical malpractice and loss of spousal consortium on June 9, 2008. Defendant moved to have the claim dismissed on the grounds the written medical opinion attached to the complaint lacked sufficient detail for the purposes of § 52-190(a). The trial court granted the defendant’s motion. Plaintiff appealed.

SUMMARY OF FACTS:

On March 12, 2006, plaintiff underwent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in order to treat gallbladder disease. Schwartz was the surgeon that performed the procedure. Plaintiff alleges that Schwartz performed the procedure negligently, causing plaintiff to suffer “severe, painful and permanent injuries.” Plaintiffs allege that Schwartz breached the applicable standard of care in that he (1) “failed to assure the adequate and accurate identification of Plaintiff’s internal anatomy prior to proceeding with laparoscopic cholecystectomy,” (2) “failed to prevent injury to Plaintiff’s biliary structures during the laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and (3) “failed to accurately document the surgical procedure…”

Attached to the plaintiff’s complaint was a certificate of reasonable inquiry and a written and signed medical opinion.  The medical opinion certifies that “to a reasonable degree of medical probability, there are deviations from the applicable standards of care pertaining to the treatment of Kristy Wilcox provided by Daniel S. Schwartz, M.D.…”

OUTCOME AT TRIAL:

The trial court dismissed the plaintiff’s complaint, ruling that the medical opinion did not satisfy the minimum amount of detail required to bring such a complaint.

ISSUES ON APPEAL:

Must a medical opinion in a complaint for medical malpractice specify the evidence of the alleged malpractice?

SUPREME COURT HOLDINGS:
No
RELEVANT APPLICATION OF LAW:

The court relied on Dias v. Grady, 292, Conn. 350, 972 A.2d  715 (2009)

“It is clear that in order to fulfill the requirement of  § 52- 190a (a) and to provide assurance that “there appears to be evidence of medical negligence,” a claimant’s written opinion from a similar health care provider need not address the issue of causation. Further, the opinion must indicate that there appears to be evidence of a breach of the standard of care.

Client Reviews

  • Having worked in the medical field, I appreciated the way that Mr. Rosenfeld and his staff approached my family’s situation. The combination of medical knowledge and legal expertise was indeed the winning combination for our case.
    ★★★★★
  • While nothing can change the way our mother was treated at a nursing facility, I do feel a sense of vindication that the facility was forced to pay for their treatment. I am certain that they would never have done had my attorneys not held their feet to the fire.
    ★★★★★
  • I was very nervous about initiating a claim against my mother’s nursing facility, but Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers took care of everything from getting the medical records to going to court. I felt like I had real advocates on my side. That meant a lot to me.
    ★★★★★
  • After a horrific episode at a nursing home, my sister and I spoke to a number of law firms. No one took the time to answer our questions and explain the legal process like Mr. Rosenfeld. He did a tremendous job on our case and I can see why he’s earned the praise he has from clients and peers.
    ★★★★★
  • I liked the fact that I could call the office and ask questions about the legal process at anytime. I could tell that my case was in good hands. I think that this was reflected in my father’s settlement was more than I anticipated the case ever being worth.
    ★★★★★