Published on:

Whitaker v. Hill Nursing Home, Inc. (210 P.3d 877)

nursing-home-abuse-Oklahoma-elderly-woman-300x193Articles: Oklahoma

Whitaker v. Hill Nursing Home, Inc. (210 P.3d 877)

Whitaker v. Hill Nursing Home, Inc. (210 P.3d 877)
Plaintiff (Appellee) – Christine Whitaker, Personal Representative for the Estate of James Richard (Deceased)
Defendant (Appellant) – Hill Nursing Home, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oklahoma (2009)
Whitaker, granddaughter of James Richard (deceased), brought wrongful death and breach of contract suit against Hill Nursing Home, Inc. on March 29, 2007. Hill filed a motion for summary judgment on the basis that the suit was barred by a two- year statute of limitations. The trial court granted Hill’s motion. Plaintiff appealed.
Mr. Richard moved into Hill Nursing Home in January of 2003. On May 12, 2004, he was transferred to McCurtain Memorial Hospital where he died on May 19, 2004. Plaintiff filed a petition on March 29, 2007 alleging that the nursing home engaged in a pattern of “ongoing neglect” and that the nursing home’s “continuing course of repeated negligence” including its “failure to take the precautions necessary to ensure the decedent’s health and safety, failure to provide proper and timely services” resulted in mental and physical injury, pain and suffering, medical expenses, and ultimately his death. The claim also asserts claims for breach of contract and negligence per se on the basis that the nursing home violated the Oklahoma Nursing Home Care Act.
The trial court granted the defendant’s motion, ruling that the suit was barred by a two- year statute of limitations.
Did the trial court properly apply the two- year statute of limitations set forth in 76 O.S. § 18?
“An action for damages for injury or death against any physician, health care provider or hospital licensed under the laws of this state, whether based in tort, breach of contract or otherwise, arising out of patient care, shall be brought within two (2) years of the date the plaintiff knew or should have known, through the exercise of reasonable diligence, of the existence of the death, injury or condition complained of…”

– 76 O.S. § 18


The Court also relied on the Oklahoma Nursing Home Care Act in finding that Hill did in fact qualify as a healthcare provider:


“any person or other entity who is licensed pursuant to the provisions of Title 59 or Title 63 of the Oklahoma Statutes…to render health care services in the practice of a profession or in the ordinary course of business.”

Client Reviews

  • Having worked in the medical field, I appreciated the way that Mr. Rosenfeld and his staff approached my family’s situation. The combination of medical knowledge and legal expertise was indeed the winning combination for our case.
  • While nothing can change the way our mother was treated at a nursing facility, I do feel a sense of vindication that the facility was forced to pay for their treatment. I am certain that they would never have done had my attorneys not held their feet to the fire.
  • I was very nervous about initiating a claim against my mother’s nursing facility, but Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers took care of everything from getting the medical records to going to court. I felt like I had real advocates on my side. That meant a lot to me.
  • After a horrific episode at a nursing home, my sister and I spoke to a number of law firms. No one took the time to answer our questions and explain the legal process like Mr. Rosenfeld. He did a tremendous job on our case and I can see why he’s earned the praise he has from clients and peers.
  • I liked the fact that I could call the office and ask questions about the legal process at anytime. I could tell that my case was in good hands. I think that this was reflected in my father’s settlement was more than I anticipated the case ever being worth.