Published on:

Wayland v. New Light Nursing Home Corporation (2007 WL 2744638 (Mich.App.))

Michigan-nursing-home-abuse-elderly-woman-300x200Articles: Michigan

Wayland v. New Light Nursing Home Corporation (2007 WL 2744638 (Mich.App.))

CASE:
Wayland v. New Light Nursing Home Corporation (2007 WL 2744638 (Mich.App.))
PARTIES:
Plaintiff (Appellee) – Wayland, as guardian of Thelma Johnson, an Incapacitated Individual
Defendant (Appellant) – New Light Nursing Home Corporation
COURT:
Court of Appeals of Michigan (2007)
PROCEDURAL HISTORY:

Plaintiff, mother of Thelma Johnson, sued the defendant alleging that they negligently failed to train and supervise its employees and provide for the safety of her mother. After pleadings and several motions had been filed, plaintiff, defendant, and Admiral (defendant’s insurer up until July 2, 2000) entered into a “Release and Indemnity Agreement,” in which plaintiff agreed, in return for a payment of $27,500 by Admiral on behalf of defendant, to release defendant and Admiral from “any and all” claims and causes of action,” which accrued prior to July 2, 2000.

Subsequently, plaintiff entered into an arbitration agreement giving the arbitrators “full powers to make a determination as to any and all claims” of plaintiff against defendant.  The arbitration panel awarded plaintiff $125,000. Pursuant to defendant’s motion, the trial court found that defendant was entitled to set off the $27,500 settlement from the arbitration award. Plaintiff appealed.

SUMMARY OF FACTS:

Plaintiff’s mother resided at defendant nursing home from March 28, 2000, until September 14, 2000. During this period, defendant held two insurance policies. Prior to July 2, 2000, defendant was insured by Admiral Insurance Company. Beginning July 2, 2000, defendant was insured by Legion Insurance Company.

On September 5, 2000, plaintiff was informed that another resident had struck her mother. On September 6, 2000, plaintiff discovered that her mother had fallen.  Plaintiff sued defendant for negligence.

OUTCOME AT TRIAL:

Trial court ruled that since the awards stemmed from the same injury, the amount awarded by the arbitration panel could be set off in the amount of the previous settlement.

ISSUES ON APPEAL:

Should the trial court have set off the amount of the settlement agreement from the arbitration award because it would constitute double recovery?

SUPREME COURT HOLDINGS:
No
RELEVANT APPLICATION OF LAW:
“Where a recovery is obtained for any injury identical with another in nature, time, and place, that recovery must be deducted from the plaintiff’s other award.”

  • Grace v. Grace, 253 Mich.App 357, 369

The court found that the above rule was not applicable because the settlement agreement did not purport to compensate plaintiff for the injury her mother allegedly suffered in September 2000, but rather was to release Admiral from any claims against the policy prior to July 2, 2000. Therefore, the settlement and arbitration awards did not constitute double recovery.

Client Reviews

  • Having worked in the medical field, I appreciated the way that Mr. Rosenfeld and his staff approached my family’s situation. The combination of medical knowledge and legal expertise was indeed the winning combination for our case.
    ★★★★★
  • While nothing can change the way our mother was treated at a nursing facility, I do feel a sense of vindication that the facility was forced to pay for their treatment. I am certain that they would never have done had my attorneys not held their feet to the fire.
    ★★★★★
  • I was very nervous about initiating a claim against my mother’s nursing facility, but Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers took care of everything from getting the medical records to going to court. I felt like I had real advocates on my side. That meant a lot to me.
    ★★★★★
  • After a horrific episode at a nursing home, my sister and I spoke to a number of law firms. No one took the time to answer our questions and explain the legal process like Mr. Rosenfeld. He did a tremendous job on our case and I can see why he’s earned the praise he has from clients and peers.
    ★★★★★
  • I liked the fact that I could call the office and ask questions about the legal process at anytime. I could tell that my case was in good hands. I think that this was reflected in my father’s settlement was more than I anticipated the case ever being worth.
    ★★★★★