Published on:

Tripp v. Cranberry Pointe Rehab and Skilled Care Center (55 Mass.App.Ct. 1114)

Massachusetts-nursing-home-abuse-elderly-woman-199x300Articles: Massachusetts

Tripp v. Cranberry Pointe Rehab and Skilled Care Center (55 Mass.App.Ct. 1114)

CASE:
Tripp v. Cranberry Pointe Rehab and Skilled Care Center (55 Mass.App.Ct. 1114)
PARTIES:
Plaintiff (Appellee) – Tripp, administratrix of the estate of Mary Ellis (Deceased)
Defendant (Appellant) – Cranberry Pointe Rehab and Skilled Care Center & another
COURT:
Appeals Court of Massachusetts (2002)
PROCEDURAL HISTORY:

Plaintiff filed suit against defendant nursing home and treating physician, Dr. Bickford, alleging negligence and wrongful death. The medical malpractice tribunal found that there was insufficient evidence to raise a legitimate question of liability. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. The trial court granted the motions. Plaintiff appealed.

SUMMARY OF FACTS:

Mary Ellis was admitted to Cranberry Pointe Rehab and Skilled Care Center on June 4, 1993, following hospitalization for a pelvic fracture. At the time she was admitted to the facility, Mary suffered from insulin dependent diabetes, mellitus, neurogenic bladder, dementia, osteoarthritis of the spine, and splendic cyst.

At some point after her admittance she was also diagnosed with organic brain syndrome, permanent urinary incontinence, and depression. On March 26, 1997, Ellis was diagnosed with advanced dementia (of the Alzheimer’s type).

Back on February 26, 1997, Ellis was treated for stomach pains and blood in her stool. No further documentation of guaiac testing occurred until June 8, 1997. After a blood test on that day showed low hemoglobin, Ellis was transferred to Cape Cod Hospital for a blood transfusion.

On June 20, 1997 Ellis underwent a colonoscopy which revealed colon cancer. Her family declined colon surgery and Ellis died on June 26, 1997. Plaintiff sued saying that defendant was negligent in not diagnosing the cancer sooner, leading to Ellis’ death.

OUTCOME AT TRIAL:

The trial court dismissed the case ruling that the malpractice tribunal’s finding that there was insufficient evidence of causation was not in error.

ISSUES ON APPEAL:

Was there sufficient evidence to indicate that is was more probable than not Ellis would have lived longer or suffered less had the colon cancer been diagnosed earlier?

SUPREME COURT HOLDINGS:
No
RELEVANT APPLICATION OF LAW:
In order to allow a case of medical malpractice to go forward the plaintiff must prove (1) the defendants were providers of health care; (2) the defendant’ s treatment of the patient did not conform to acceptable medical standards; and (3) patient suffered harm as a result there from.

  • Plaintiff did not adequately prove the third element here

Client Reviews

  • Having worked in the medical field, I appreciated the way that Mr. Rosenfeld and his staff approached my family’s situation. The combination of medical knowledge and legal expertise was indeed the winning combination for our case.
    ★★★★★
  • While nothing can change the way our mother was treated at a nursing facility, I do feel a sense of vindication that the facility was forced to pay for their treatment. I am certain that they would never have done had my attorneys not held their feet to the fire.
    ★★★★★
  • I was very nervous about initiating a claim against my mother’s nursing facility, but Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers took care of everything from getting the medical records to going to court. I felt like I had real advocates on my side. That meant a lot to me.
    ★★★★★
  • After a horrific episode at a nursing home, my sister and I spoke to a number of law firms. No one took the time to answer our questions and explain the legal process like Mr. Rosenfeld. He did a tremendous job on our case and I can see why he’s earned the praise he has from clients and peers.
    ★★★★★
  • I liked the fact that I could call the office and ask questions about the legal process at anytime. I could tell that my case was in good hands. I think that this was reflected in my father’s settlement was more than I anticipated the case ever being worth.
    ★★★★★