Published on:

The Invalidity Of Nursing Home Arbitration Clauses

Nursing Home Arbitration ClausesThe recent Illinois Appellate Court decision in Sue Carter v. SSC Odin Operating Company, LLC, (885 N.E. 2d 1204, 319 Ill.Dec. 524 (2008) effectively invalidated all mandatory arbitration clauses in Illinois in a nursing home setting.  In Carter, the daughter of a nursing home resident brought a wrongful death and survival cause of action under the Nursing Home Care Act against the nursing home where her mother was a resident.  Ms. Carter executed a ‘Health Care Arbitration Agreement’ on her mothers behalf when she admitted her mother to the facility.  The arbitration agreement was to be governed by the Federal Arbitration Act.

After filing her case, the defendant – nursing home, filed a motion to compel arbitration pursuant to the earlier agreement Ms. Carter signed.  In denying the nursing homes request to compel arbitration, the court relied on the Section 3-606  and 3-607 of the Nursing Home Care Act;

Any waiver by a resident or his legal representative of the right to commence an action under Sections 3-601 through 3-607, whether oral or in writing, shall be null and void, and without legal force or effect.  210 ILCS 45/3-607 (West 2006)

Further, Section 3-607 states,

Any party to a cause of action brought under Sections 3-601 through 3-607 shall be entitled to a trial by jury and any waiver of the right to trail by jury, whether oral or in writing, prior to the commencement of an action, shall be null and void and without legal force or effect.  210 ILCS 45/3-607 (West 2006)

Judges have a sense of what’s right.  In analyzing the enforceability of the arbitration agreement the trial court stated the agreements were ‘indirection violation of emphatically stated public policy and for lack of mutuality.’  Put another way, the sophisticated nursing home lawyers, were attempting to negotiate with ordinary people in a desperate situation to find a decent facility.  The people were not  aware of the effects of their actions.

Client Reviews

  • Having worked in the medical field, I appreciated the way that Mr. Rosenfeld and his staff approached my family’s situation. The combination of medical knowledge and legal expertise was indeed the winning combination for our case.
  • While nothing can change the way our mother was treated at a nursing facility, I do feel a sense of vindication that the facility was forced to pay for their treatment. I am certain that they would never have done had my attorneys not held their feet to the fire.
  • I was very nervous about initiating a claim against my mother’s nursing facility, but Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers took care of everything from getting the medical records to going to court. I felt like I had real advocates on my side. That meant a lot to me.
  • After a horrific episode at a nursing home, my sister and I spoke to a number of law firms. No one took the time to answer our questions and explain the legal process like Mr. Rosenfeld. He did a tremendous job on our case and I can see why he’s earned the praise he has from clients and peers.
  • I liked the fact that I could call the office and ask questions about the legal process at anytime. I could tell that my case was in good hands. I think that this was reflected in my father’s settlement was more than I anticipated the case ever being worth.