Published on:

Dove v. Ty Cobb Healthcare Systems, Inc. (305 Ga.App. 13)

Georgia-nursing-home-abuse-elderly-man-200x300Articles: Georgia

Dove v. Ty Cobb Healthcare Systems, Inc. (305 Ga.App. 13)

CASE:
Dove v. Ty Cobb Healthcare Systems, Inc. (305 Ga.App. 13)
PARTIES:
Plaintiff (Appellee) – Dove, Representing the estate of Ann Royston (Deceased)
Defendant (Appellant) – Ty Cobb Healthcare Systems, Inc.
COURT:
Court of Appeals of Georgia (2010)
PROCEDURAL HISTORY:

On May 22, 2007, Ann Royston Dove, on behalf of her deceased mother, filed a malpractice suit against Ty Cobb Healthcare Systems, operator of the nursing home Dove’s mother resided in prior to her death. Cobb filed a motion for partial summary judgment. The trial court granted Cobb’s motion. Dove appealed.

SUMMARY OF FACTS:

Ann Royston was admitted to defendant nursing home on July 5, 2000 at the age of 81 after she suffered a debilitating heart attack. Shortly after being admitted, Dove began to suspect that the staff at the nursing home was not being attentive to her mother’s needs.

Between December 2000 and 2005, Royston suffered 5 broken hips, the nursing home contended, from falling out of her bed. Royston also suffered bouts of rapid weight loss, bedsores, bruises, a broken ankle. There were also numerous other occasions when Royston’s bed was left wet and she fell over her bedrails. Royston passed away on February 16, 2007. On May 22, 2007, Dove filed suit alleging that the nursing home had deviated from the professional standard of care in her mother’s treatment.

Dove later amended her complaint to allege that they nursing home engaged in fraud by misrepresenting that her mother’s broken hips were caused by her falls out of the bed and by falsifying her medical records.

Cobb filed a motion for partial summary judgment arguing that any alleged incidents that occurred prior to May 22, 2005 were barred by a 2 year statute of limitations.

OUTCOME AT TRIAL:

The trial court ruled in favor of Cobb, finding that Cobb’s alleged fraud did not deter Dove from bringing an action.

ISSUES ON APPEAL:

Did the nursing home’s assertion that Royston’s broken hips were caused by falls from her bed amount to fraud that would toll the statute of limitations for the negligence claims?

SUPREME COURT HOLDINGS:
No
RELEVANT APPLICATION OF LAW:

“Even if evidence of fraud exists, the statute of limitations id not tolled when the plaintiff knew all facts necessary to show malpractice before the running of the period of limitation.”

  • Hendrix v. Schrecengost, 183 Ga.App. 201

Client Reviews

  • Having worked in the medical field, I appreciated the way that Mr. Rosenfeld and his staff approached my family’s situation. The combination of medical knowledge and legal expertise was indeed the winning combination for our case.
    ★★★★★
  • While nothing can change the way our mother was treated at a nursing facility, I do feel a sense of vindication that the facility was forced to pay for their treatment. I am certain that they would never have done had my attorneys not held their feet to the fire.
    ★★★★★
  • I was very nervous about initiating a claim against my mother’s nursing facility, but Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers took care of everything from getting the medical records to going to court. I felt like I had real advocates on my side. That meant a lot to me.
    ★★★★★
  • After a horrific episode at a nursing home, my sister and I spoke to a number of law firms. No one took the time to answer our questions and explain the legal process like Mr. Rosenfeld. He did a tremendous job on our case and I can see why he’s earned the praise he has from clients and peers.
    ★★★★★
  • I liked the fact that I could call the office and ask questions about the legal process at anytime. I could tell that my case was in good hands. I think that this was reflected in my father’s settlement was more than I anticipated the case ever being worth.
    ★★★★★