Published on:

Bishop v. Medical Facilities of America (2004 WL 1858694 (Va.Cir.Ct.))

virginia-elderly-woman-nursing-home-abuse-200x300Articles: Virginia

Bishop v. Medical Facilities of America (2004 WL 1858694 (Va.Cir.Ct.))

Bishop v. Medical Facilities of America (2004 WL 1858694 (Va.Cir.Ct.))
Plaintiff (Appellee) – Joseph Bishop, Executor of the Estate of Eva Bishop (Deceased)
Defendant (Appellant) – Medical Facilities of America
Circuit Court of Virginia, City of Roanoke (2004)

Joseph Bishop, Executor of the Estate of Eva Bishop, brought a wrongful death action against the Defendant nursing facility. The facility filed a motion to dismiss and, failing that, a motion to compel arbitration.


On August 9, 2002, Eva Bishop was admitted to the Defendant’s healthcare center where she remained a resident until her death on September 15, 2002. At the time of Eva’s admission, her son, Joseph Bishop (the named plaintiff in this case), signed the admission documents because his mother “lacked the physical ability and mental capacity to do so.”

At the time of Eva’s admission, Joe Bishop held her power of attorney. Within the documents was a Binding Arbitration clause indicating that the resident and facility agreed that “ALL CLAIMS DISPUTES OR DISAGREEMENTS between them (or their respective successors, assigns or representatives)” would be resolved through BINDING ARBITRATION. Joseph Bishop signed the documents on the line marked “Responsible Party.”

After Eva’s death, Joseph brought the above action for wrongful death against the facility.


No. The Defendant’s Plea in Bar, Motion to Compel Arbitration and Motion to Dismiss was denied.


Is the wrongful death action filed by the Executor of the Estate of Eva Bishop subject to the mandatory arbitration provision contained in a nursing home care contract which Eva Bishop did not sign but was clearly entered into for her benefit?

“Arbitration agreements cannot be extended by construction or application… The law is clear that persons who are not parties to an arbitration agreement cannot be compelled to participate in arbitration.”

  • City of Peru v. Illinois Power Company, 258 Ill.App.3d 309, 196 Ill.Dec. 519, 630 N.E.2d 454, 457 (1994)

Client Reviews

  • Having worked in the medical field, I appreciated the way that Mr. Rosenfeld and his staff approached my family’s situation. The combination of medical knowledge and legal expertise was indeed the winning combination for our case.
  • While nothing can change the way our mother was treated at a nursing facility, I do feel a sense of vindication that the facility was forced to pay for their treatment. I am certain that they would never have done had my attorneys not held their feet to the fire.
  • I was very nervous about initiating a claim against my mother’s nursing facility, but Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers took care of everything from getting the medical records to going to court. I felt like I had real advocates on my side. That meant a lot to me.
  • After a horrific episode at a nursing home, my sister and I spoke to a number of law firms. No one took the time to answer our questions and explain the legal process like Mr. Rosenfeld. He did a tremendous job on our case and I can see why he’s earned the praise he has from clients and peers.
  • I liked the fact that I could call the office and ask questions about the legal process at anytime. I could tell that my case was in good hands. I think that this was reflected in my father’s settlement was more than I anticipated the case ever being worth.