Published on:

Doctor Alleges Dehydration & Malnutrition In Nursing Home Lawsuit On Behalf Of Relative

Dehydration & Malnutrition In Nursing Home LawsuitA Kentucky jury is hearing evidence in wrongful death lawsuit against a nursing home that allegedly failed to provide sufficient nutrition and fluids which in turn contributed to her death.

The lawsuit was initiated by a physician who is a relative of the deceased patient.  According to information contained in the lawsuit and remarks made by attorney’s during opening statements, the woman was admitted to Woodland Oaks from May 24, 2003 to June 30, 2003 for rehabilitation from a recent hip fracture.

It was during her admission that staff failed to provide proper care and allowed her to become dehydration and malnourished. As a result of the dehydration and malnutrition, the woman developed a severe urinary tract infection amongst other medical problems that lead to her death on August 3, 2003.

Lawyers representing the woman’s estate were quick to identify facts that supported their allegation such as:

  • The woman received only 600-700 cc of fluids per day despite an order for 1,770cc
  • The woman’s weight dropped from 132 pounds to 116 pounds during her admission
  • The nursing home identified the woman as having ‘fair’ potential to make significant improvement

Not surprisingly, lawyers representing the nursing home are quick to portray the woman was an elderly person who had a lot of medical problems and her complications were basically a manifestation of the inevitable.

Confused as to which story to believe?

So are other people.  This same case was tried on two prior occasions that resulted in mistrials.  As the jury hears the evidence in this trial they will be forced to decide if they should any— or a portion of the $12 million sought by the the woman’s family.

Not surprisingly, these contrasting versions of events and patient quality of life arise in most nursing home negligence lawsuits.  While persuasive lawyers may be effective in presenting the evidence, many trials also utilize the expertise of retained experts to assist the jury in understanding some of the relatively complex medical issues that arise.

Of course the type of expert needs to be tailored to the specific type of case, but as a nursing home lawyer I frequently use the following experts on my cases:

  • Orthopedic surgeons
  • Nurses
  • Geriatricians
  • Infectious disease experts
  • Economists
  • Physiatrists
  • Forensic accountants

Related:

Attorneys dispute care given to patient, Ironton Tribune December 1, 2010

Seems Like Common Sense, Yet Many Medical Facilities Continue To Ignore Patients Daily Hydration Needs

Meals: Nutrition vs. Neglect

Dehydration Death Costs Nursing Home $6.5M

Client Reviews

  • Having worked in the medical field, I appreciated the way that Mr. Rosenfeld and his staff approached my family’s situation. The combination of medical knowledge and legal expertise was indeed the winning combination for our case.
    ★★★★★
  • While nothing can change the way our mother was treated at a nursing facility, I do feel a sense of vindication that the facility was forced to pay for their treatment. I am certain that they would never have done had my attorneys not held their feet to the fire.
    ★★★★★
  • I was very nervous about initiating a claim against my mother’s nursing facility, but Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers took care of everything from getting the medical records to going to court. I felt like I had real advocates on my side. That meant a lot to me.
    ★★★★★
  • After a horrific episode at a nursing home, my sister and I spoke to a number of law firms. No one took the time to answer our questions and explain the legal process like Mr. Rosenfeld. He did a tremendous job on our case and I can see why he’s earned the praise he has from clients and peers.
    ★★★★★
  • I liked the fact that I could call the office and ask questions about the legal process at anytime. I could tell that my case was in good hands. I think that this was reflected in my father’s settlement was more than I anticipated the case ever being worth.
    ★★★★★