Published on:

A Legal Victory For Nursing Home Residents. State Laws Can Supersede Federal Arbitration Act

Picture-29Some court decisions leave lots of room for future generations of law school classes to debate the subtleties of the Judge’s wording.  Yet, other times the the court’s action–without rendering an opinion– can have equally powerful results. What could I possibly be inarticulately blabbering about?

June 1st marked the deadline by which the U.S. Supreme Court could grant review of an Illinois Appellate Court decision nullifying nursing home arbitration arbitration agreements. Instead, the court decided to leave the Appellate decision untouched– in essence giving its stamp of approval to a holding striking an appellate court decision that invalidated mandatory arbitration agreements in nursing home negligence cases.

In Sue Carter v. SSC Odin Operating Company, LLC, (885 N.E. 2d 1204, 319 Ill.Dec. 524 (2008), the daughter of a nursing home resident brought a wrongful death and survival cause of action under the Illinois Nursing Home Care Act against the nursing home where her mother was a resident.  Despite the fact that Ms. Carter executed a ‘Health Care Arbitration Agreement’ on her mothers behalf when she admitted her mother to the facility, the Appellate Court ruled that state law preserved her right to a jury trial.

The nursing home operator appealed the Appellate Court decision, claiming the mandatory arbitration clause, pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act, should overrule any state law as the federal legislation should take precedent.

Consequently, nursing home arbitration agreements in Illinois will likely be a thing of the past. Perhaps, this action by the court will dissuade other states from enforcing similar agreements.

Read more about this important case preserving nursing home resident rights here.

Nursing Homes Abuse Blog Posts On Arbitration Agreements

The Invalidity Of Nursing Home Arbitration Clauses

Are Trials Really That Important?

Michigan Court Strikes Nursing Home ‘Arbitration Clause’ And Allows Wrongful Death Case To Proceed In Court

AARP Joins Fight To Preserve Right To Jury Trial

Client Reviews

  • Having worked in the medical field, I appreciated the way that Mr. Rosenfeld and his staff approached my family’s situation. The combination of medical knowledge and legal expertise was indeed the winning combination for our case.
  • While nothing can change the way our mother was treated at a nursing facility, I do feel a sense of vindication that the facility was forced to pay for their treatment. I am certain that they would never have done had my attorneys not held their feet to the fire.
  • I was very nervous about initiating a claim against my mother’s nursing facility, but Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers took care of everything from getting the medical records to going to court. I felt like I had real advocates on my side. That meant a lot to me.
  • After a horrific episode at a nursing home, my sister and I spoke to a number of law firms. No one took the time to answer our questions and explain the legal process like Mr. Rosenfeld. He did a tremendous job on our case and I can see why he’s earned the praise he has from clients and peers.
  • I liked the fact that I could call the office and ask questions about the legal process at anytime. I could tell that my case was in good hands. I think that this was reflected in my father’s settlement was more than I anticipated the case ever being worth.