Published on:

$5 Million In Punitive Damages Awarded To Widow In Bed Sore Case Against Nursing Home & Hospital

Picture-162A Philadelphia jury awarded $5 million in punitive damages to the widow of a man who died from bed sores he developed during a hospitalization and then worsened during a subsequent nursing home admission.

The case, believed to be the first of its kind in terms of awarding punitive damages against a nursing home in Philadelphia courts, was allocated: $1.5 million against Jeanes Hospital and $3.5 million against Hillcrest Convalescent Home.

According to widow’s lawyer, Steven R. Maher, Jeans Hospital failed to diagnose the man’s urinary tract infection that contributed to the development of bed sores (also referred to as: pressure sores, pressure ulcers or decubitus ulcers) and then the man was transferred to Hillcrest Nursing Home where the bed sores worsened.  Despite his wife’s best efforts to care for her husband at home, the man succumbed to the bed sores approximately two years after he developed them.

This punitive damage award is in addition to a $1 million compensatory damage award a jury had previously awarded in the case.   Incidentally, Jeanes Hospital is part of the Temple University Health System and Hillcrest is owned by Genesis HealthCare Corp., a large nursing home operator in the Northeast.

While punitive damages are rare due to the high threshold an injured party must prove, in this case ‘outrageous and reckless conduct’, it doesn’t surprise me that these type of damages were awarded in a bed sore case.

Obviously, the plaintiff’s lawyers did a great job presenting their case, but when jurors hear and see how devastating a bed sore can be, it most definitely evokes feelings of rage– when they see how a medical facilities neglect resulted in such devastating injuries such as advanced bed sores.


Over 500,000 Adults Suffer From Bed Sores In Hospitals

New York Jury Punishes Nursing Home Where Man Develops More Than 20 Bed Sores

Client Reviews

  • Having worked in the medical field, I appreciated the way that Mr. Rosenfeld and his staff approached my family’s situation. The combination of medical knowledge and legal expertise was indeed the winning combination for our case.
  • While nothing can change the way our mother was treated at a nursing facility, I do feel a sense of vindication that the facility was forced to pay for their treatment. I am certain that they would never have done had my attorneys not held their feet to the fire.
  • I was very nervous about initiating a claim against my mother’s nursing facility, but Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers took care of everything from getting the medical records to going to court. I felt like I had real advocates on my side. That meant a lot to me.
  • After a horrific episode at a nursing home, my sister and I spoke to a number of law firms. No one took the time to answer our questions and explain the legal process like Mr. Rosenfeld. He did a tremendous job on our case and I can see why he’s earned the praise he has from clients and peers.
  • I liked the fact that I could call the office and ask questions about the legal process at anytime. I could tell that my case was in good hands. I think that this was reflected in my father’s settlement was more than I anticipated the case ever being worth.